JURNAL PANAH KEADILAN

PENTINGNYA PEMAHAMAN HUKUM UNDANG-UNDANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK DALAM ERA DIGITAL

2024-08-15T05:42:16+07:00

The development of information and communication technology (ICT) has changed various aspects of human life, making understanding the laws governing the use of this technology, such as the Information and Electronic Transactions Law (UU ITE), very important. The ITE Law in Indonesia, which was passed in 2008, was revised in 2016. The second amendment in 2024 regulates various aspects ranging from electronic transactions to criminal sanctions for misuse of information technology. A good understanding of the ITE Law can provide legal protection, create safe transactions, prevent violations, and increase people's digital literacy. Violations of the ITE Law can result in legal sanctions, financial losses, reputation damage, and threats to data security. This article highlights the importance of education and understanding of the ITE Law to build a safe and responsible digital ecosystem.

IMPLEMENTASI HUKUM PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA JUAL BELI TANAH

2024-08-15T05:42:16+07:00

In terms of buying and selling land, it is a common thing that is easily recognized by every community, but on the other hand, it must be noted that buying and selling land must see the completeness of the seller's files so that evidence of an authentic deed can be seen from the certificate or letter issued by the PPAT, to avoid legal personal in the future. This study aims to determine the implementation of the legal responsibility of land deed making officials in making land sale and purchase deeds. This study uses a normative legal research method with a conceptual and legislative approach. The results of the study show that by carrying out the sale and purchase before the PPAT, clear requirements are met (not dark legal acts, which are carried out secretly). The PPAT is responsible for checking the requirements for the validity of legal acts that the responsibility as a PPAT profession, in making a sale and purchase deed, a PPAT is expected and required to be more careful and issue a sale and purchase deed without ignoring the standardization of the issuance of a sale and purchase deed.

PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM ATAS GUGATAN PENGGUGAT TIDAK DAPAT DITERIMA DALAM PERKARA PERCERAIAN

2024-08-15T05:42:16+07:00

Divorce is a manifestation of the failure of the goal of marriage to form a happy and eternal family. One of the divorce lawsuits that has been decided by the district court and has permanent legal force is decision number 41/Pdt.G/2021/PN Gst. In this decision, the judge handed down the decision "the plaintiff's claim cannot be accepted" because the reason for the dissolution of the marriage stated by the plaintiff did not meet the requirements for dissolution of the marriage. Therefore, this research aims to find out and analyze the judge's considerations regarding the decision that the plaintiff's lawsuit cannot be accepted in a divorce case (study decision number 41/Pdt.G/2021/PN Gst). The type of research used in this research is normative legal research using secondary data and using the statutory regulatory approach, case approach and analytical approach, as well as using qualitative data analysis. Based on the research findings and discussion, the author concludes that the judge's basic consideration of the plaintiff's claim cannot be accepted in a divorce case (study decision number 41/Pdt.G/2021/PN Gst) with the decision not being accepted because the panel of judges focuses on the reasons - the reasons for divorce as intended in Article 19 letter b of the PP Implementing the Law on Marriage. The author suggests that everyone who files a lawsuit for divorce must pay attention to the reasons for divorce that have been specified in Article 19 letter b of the PP Implementing the Law on Marriage.

AKIBAT HUKUM TIDAK DILAKSANAKAN PUTUSAN HAKIM PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA

2024-08-15T05:42:16+07:00

The fulfillment of the element of utility in a judge's ruling is achieved through execution, ensuring that justice for the parties involved is not merely inscribed on paper, as paper is merely a tool, while justice must be felt. This study aims to understand, comprehend, and analyze the legal consequences of the non-execution of administrative court rulings. The type of research employed is normative legal research, utilizing a statutory approach and an analytical approach, with data collection techniques involving literature study through the analysis of secondary data. Based on the findings and discussions, it can be concluded that the legal consequence of not executing an administrative court ruling is the imposition of sanctions as stipulated in Article 116 of Law No. 51 of 2009 concerning Administrative Courts, in the form of the payment of coercive fines and administrative sanctions. Dwangsom or coercive fines refer to the payment of a certain amount of money, either in a lump sum or in installments, to the individual or their heirs, or to a private legal entity, which is charged to the defendant (a State Administrative Body or Official) for failing to execute an Administrative Court ruling that has permanent legal force (inkracht van gewijsde) and which causes material losses to an individual or private legal entity. In such cases, sanctions in the form of compensation and rehabilitation may be imposed. In administrative court proceedings, the obligation to pay compensation and the imposition of compensation may result in enforcement actions, such as execution, if the losing party fails to comply with or neglects to implement the court's ruling. This action is carried out by the state through court officials upon the request of the winning party in the ruling.

PENERAPAN SANKSI PERDATA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DITIJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG RI NOMOR 32 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG LINGKUNGAN HIDUP

2025-02-11T16:32:38+07:00

Lingkungan hidup merupakan tempat dimana semua makhuluk hidup bertahan, bertumbuh dan berkembang tanpa terkecuali untuk melangsungkan kehidupan. Sehingga negara-negara diseluruh dunia sangat memperhatikan kelestarian lingkungan hidup, dengan tujuan supaya semua makhluk hidup tidak mengalami kepunahan. Untuk melestarikan lingkungan hidup setiap negara memiliki peraturan perundang-undangan tersendiri, seperti di negara Indonesia pengaturan mengenai lingkungan hidup di dasarkan pada pasal 33 UUD Tahun 1945, yang kemudian lebih lanjut sekarang ini mengenai pengaturan lingkungan hidup diatur di dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 32 tahun 2009. Di dalam Undang-Undang tentang Lingkungan hidup di Indonesia menerapkan 3 (tiga) jenis sanksi menyelesaikan sengketa lingkungan hidup yaitu sanksi pidana, sanksi administrasi dan sanksi perdata. Dari jenis sanksi tersebut dalam penelitian ini penulis hanya menganalisis dan mengkaji mengenai penerapan sanksi perdata di dalam sengketa lingkungan hidup. Seiring dengan perkembangan hukum lingkungan hidup di Indonesia, maka sengketa lingkungan hidup tidak hanya dapat diselesaikan dengan sanksi pidana dan sanksi administrasi saja, melainkan dalam sengketa lingkungan hidup dapat diterapkan sanksi perdata dengan cara gugatan menggugat di pengadilan. Sanksi perdata dalam sengketa lingkungan hidup dapat berupa ganti rugi.