PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM ATAS GUGATAN PENGGUGAT TIDAK DAPAT DITERIMA DALAM PERKARA PERCERAIAN

(Studi Putusan Nomor 41/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Gst)

  • Antonius Ndruru Universitas Nias Raya
  • Laka Dodo Laia Universitas Nias Raya
Keywords: Judge's Consideration, The Lawsuit Cannot Be Accepted, Divorce

Abstract

Divorce is a manifestation of the failure of the goal of marriage to form a happy and eternal family. One of the divorce lawsuits that has been decided by the district court and has permanent legal force is decision number 41/Pdt.G/2021/PN Gst. In this decision, the judge handed down the decision "the plaintiff's claim cannot be accepted" because the reason for the dissolution of the marriage stated by the plaintiff did not meet the requirements for dissolution of the marriage. Therefore, this research aims to find out and analyze the judge's considerations regarding the decision that the plaintiff's lawsuit cannot be accepted in a divorce case (study decision number 41/Pdt.G/2021/PN Gst). The type of research used in this research is normative legal research using secondary data and using the statutory regulatory approach, case approach and analytical approach, as well as using qualitative data analysis. Based on the research findings and discussion, the author concludes that the judge's basic consideration of the plaintiff's claim cannot be accepted in a divorce case (study decision number 41/Pdt.G/2021/PN Gst) with the decision not being accepted because the panel of judges focuses on the reasons - the reasons for divorce as intended in Article 19 letter b of the PP Implementing the Law on Marriage. The author suggests that everyone who files a lawsuit for divorce must pay attention to the reasons for divorce that have been specified in Article 19 letter b of the PP Implementing the Law on Marriage.

References

Bachtiar. 2018. Metode Penulisan Hukum. Tangerang Selatan, Unpam Press

Ali, Achmad. 2012. Asas-asas Hukum Pembuktian Perdata, Ed. 1, Cet. 1. Jakarta: Kencana.

Arto, Mukti. 2004. Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama, Cet. 5. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Asmak Ul Hosnah, Dwi Seno Wijanarko, dan Hotma P. Sibuea. 2021. Karakteristik lmu Hukum dan Metode Penulisan Hukum Normatif, Ed. 1, Cet. 1. Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Harahap, M. Yahya. 2008. Hukum Acara Perdata: tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan, Cet. Ke-8. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Jamaluddin dan Nanda Amalia. 2016. Buku Ajar Hukum Perkawinan. Lhokseumawe: Uinimal Press.

Kosmas Dohu Amazihono dan Antoinius Ndruru. 2022. Hukum Perdata. Solok: Mitra Cendikia Media.

Laila M. Rasyid dan Herinawati. 2015. Hukum Acara Perdata. Lhokseumawe: Uinimal Press

Trisadini Prasastinah Usanti, Agus Yudha Hernoko, dan Erini Agusti. 2012. Buku Ajar Hukum Perdata. Surabaya: Pusat Penerbitan dan Percetakan Unair

Yulia. 2018. Hukum Acara Perdata. Lhokseumawe: Uinimal Press.

Published
2024-08-15
How to Cite
Ndruru, A., & Laia, L. D. (2024). PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM ATAS GUGATAN PENGGUGAT TIDAK DAPAT DITERIMA DALAM PERKARA PERCERAIAN. JURNAL PANAH KEADILAN, 3(2), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.57094/jpk.v3i2.1993