WHEN ENGAGING LEARNING IS NOT ENOUGH: EXPLORING THE ROLE OF RULE AND COMPLIANCE BASED CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT IN DISRUPTIVE CLASSROOMS
Abstract
This study examines the limitations of engaging, experience-based learning in managing disruptive classrooms and explores how teachers respond through rule- and compliance-based classroom management. Using a qualitative literature review, the study synthesizes conceptual and empirical sources on disruptive behavior, meaningful learning, emotional safety, and structured classroom management. John Dewey’s experiential learning theory serves as the primary theoretical lens, particularly his emphasis on meaningful experience, continuity, and responsibility. The findings indicate that engaging learning can reduce disruption when activities are meaningful, well designed, and supported by a psychologically safe environment. However, engagement alone often fails when students lack self-discipline, learning awareness, and emotional regulation. In such contexts, clear rules, routines, supervision, and consistent consequences provide the stability necessary for responsible participation. The study refines Dewey’s framework through the concept of internal student capital and argues that effective classrooms require meaningful learning, emotional safety, and clear structure operating together.
References
Biesta, G. J. (2015). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Routledge. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/books/mono/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9781315634319&type=googlepdf
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Kappa Delta Pi.
Guil, R., Holgado-Herrero, M., Gil-Olarte, P., González-Fernández, S., Costalat-Founeau, A.-M., & Gómez-Molinero, R. (2024). Disruptive behaviors in the classroom, a question of gender or of inadequate forms of coping? Current Psychology, 43(27), 22897–22907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06190-3
Guinness, K., Detrich, R., Keyworth, R., & States, J. (2020). Active Supervision. The Wing Institute. https://www.winginstitute.org/classroom-active-supervision
Metzger, K. J., & Langley, D. (2020). The Room Itself is Not Enough: Student Engagement in Active Learning Classrooms. College Teaching, 68(3), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2020.1768357
Odum, M., Meaney, K. S., & Knudson, D. V. (2021). Active Learning Classroom Design and Student Engagement: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Learning Spaces, 10(1), 27–42.
Rahmani, N. M. D., Rachmaniyah, Sulistio, I., Khambali, & Sherawali. (2025). Classroom Noise and Its Impact on Communication Disruptions and Students’ Academic Performance. Public Health Research Development, 2(2), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.36568/phrd.v2i2.34
Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to Learn: A View of what Education Might Become. C.E. Merrill Publishing Company.
Skinner, B. F. (1965). Science And Human Behavior. Simon and Schuster.
Tu, X. (2021). The Role of Classroom Culture and Psychological Safety in EFL Students’ Engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.760903
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, & What Works Clearinghouse. (2023). Good Behavior Game Intervention Brief (WWC 2023-004). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED628138.pdf
Whitney, T., Cooper, J., & Lingo, A. (2017). Increasing Student Engagement Through Opportunities to Respond. Kentucky Teacher Education Journal: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Kentucky Council for Exceptional Children, 3(2). https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/ktej/vol3/iss2/3
Copyright (c) 2026 Christabell Hasibuan, Ni Luh Sekar Astuti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.










