PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN KREDITUR ATAS HILANGNYA BARANG JAMINAN (STUDI DI KSP3 NIAS CABANG LAHUSA)
Mahasiswa Prodi Ilmu Hukum, FH Universitas Nias Raya
Abstract
A creditor is a party that has a bill to another party for the property or services it provides where it is agreed that the second party will return property of the same value or service. The type of research used is a type of sociological legal research in the form of empirical studies to find theories regarding the working process of contract law. This type of research is also called field research, which examines the applicable legal provisions and what happens in reality in society. In conducting this research, the data needed are primary data obtained from observations, interviews and document studies. In collecting data, the authors obtain primary data directly from the field, from the community, and/or legal entities. The data analysis used is qualitative analysis, the data obtained is then compiled to achieve clarity of the problem to be discussed and the results are set forth in the form of a description. Based on the research findings and discussion, it can be concluded that the Creditor's Responsibility for Loss of Collateral in the KSP3 Nias Study Lahusa Branch is the responsibility of the creditor for the loss of collateral in KSP3, namely the KSP3 Nias Lahusa Branch is responsible for the loss of collateral submitted by a member or customer as the collateral for the loan is in the form of a land certificate, the responsibility of KSP3 Nias Lahusa Branch by replacing the collateral. In this case, all administrative matters related to the management of the new collateral are accounted for by the KSP3 Nias Lahusa Branch. The author suggests that KSP3 Nias Lahusa Branch be even more careful in carrying out work, and store collateral items safely so that members/customers do not feel disadvantaged
References
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2005. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Edisi V. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Projodjodiikoro, Wirjonio.1981. Asas-asas Hukum Perjanjian. Bandung: PT Bale Bandung.
Satrio, J. 1993.Hukum Jaminan, Hak-hak Kebendaan. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Satrio, J. 2002. Hukum Jaminan Hak Jaminan Kebendaan Fidusia. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suharnoko.2004. Hukum Perjanjian Teori dan Analisa Kasus. Jakarta: Kencana Prenamedia Group.
Supramono, Gatot. 2014. Perjanjian Utang Piutang. Jakarta: Kencana.
Supramono, Gatot. 2013. Perjanjian Pinjam Meminjam. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada media Group.
Telaumbanua, Dalinama. 2021. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Perjanjian Pinjam Meminjam Yang Dilakukan Di Luar Pengadilan.” Jurnal Panah Keadilan. vol. 1, no. 1
Telaumbanua, Dalinama. 2020. “Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penyelesaian Perselisihan PHK.” Eksekusi. vol. 2, no. 1
Telaumbanua, Dalinama. 2015. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Di Bidang Lingkungan Hidup.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. vol. 9, no. 1
Usman, Rachmadi. 2008. Hukum Jaminan Perdataan. Banjarmasin: Sinar Grafika.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 1992 tentang Perkoperasian.
Jurnal Evi Lutviana Dewi: Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi.Vol. 9 No. 4.
http://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id