ANALISIS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA OLEH ANAK YANG MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCABULAN TERHADAP ANAK DITINJAU DARI ASPEK KEMANFAAATAN HUKUM

  • Kartini Fatemaluo Universitas Nias Raya
Keywords: Criminal Liability; Child Abuse Crime; Legal Benefits;

Abstract

The crime of sexual immorality is an unlawful act committed by a man against a woman with violence or threats of violence that does not have a legal relationship. This criminal act of sexual immorality was committed by a child against a child which had a negative impact which was tried by a panel of judges at the Sumenep District Court, namely Decision Number: 6/Pid.Sus-Anak/2017/PN Smp, In this decision the Judge decided that the defendant was legally proven and convicted of committing a criminal act by intentionally committing violence, forcing a child to have sexual intercourse with him. Sentenced to prison for 3 years and 6 months for job training at the Sumenep work center. This research is entitled analysis of criminal responsibility by children who commit criminal acts of sexual abuse against children in terms of the legal benefit aspect (Decision Study Number 6/Pid.Sus-Anak/2017/PN Smp). The type of research used is normative legal research using the statutory approach, case approach and analytical approach. Data collection was carried out using secondary data through primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The data analysis used is descriptive qualitative analysis and conclusions are drawn using a deductive method. Based on the research findings and discussion, it can be concluded that the prison sentence of 3 years and 6 months work training for the defendant does not have a legal beneficial impact on the victim who has become a victim of violence and has even given birth to a child from the defendant's actions, the judge did not pay attention to the principle of legal benefit. This is so that it is accepted by victims and the community, where the hope for law enforcement in Indonesia is carried out not only by paying attention to the legal aspects but also to social aspects that can be accepted and felt by victims or the community, such as providing restitution and recovery. Researchers are of the opinion that it is better to punish perpetrators of this crime by paying more attention to aspects of benefit for child victims, not just providing a deterrent effect or legal retaliation against the defendant.

References

Ali, Mahrus. 2012. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. 2001. Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Arifman Febriyanto Saputra Zamili. (2022). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Pemidanaan Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencabulan (Studi Putusan Nomor 6/Pid.Sus.Anak/2016/Pn.Mbn)Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Artis Duha , (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Hukuman Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana (Studi Putusan Nomor 175/Pid.B/2020/Pn Gst). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Atmasasmita, Romli. 2000. Perbandingan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Atozanolo Baene. 2022. 1. Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Bisman Gaurifa. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Dalam Pembuatan Akta Jual Beli Tanah. Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Chazawi, Adami. 2005. Tindak Pidana Mengenai Kesopanan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Chazawi, Adami. 2010. Stelse Pidana, Tindak Pidana, Teori-teori Pemidanaan dan Batas Berlakunya Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Djamil, M. Nasir . 2015. Anak Bukan Untuk Dihukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Djoko Prakoso dan Agus Imunarso. 1987. Hak Asasi Tersangka dan Peranan Psikologi dalam Konteks KUHAP. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

Edisama Buulolo. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Penjatuhan Pidana Pada Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Dengan Kekerasan (Studi Putusan Nomor 680/Pid.B/2016/Pn. Mlg) . Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Fau, A. D. (2022). Kumpulan Berbagai Karya Ilmiah & Metode Penelitian Terbaik Dosen Di Perguruan Tinggi. CV. Mitra Cendekia Media.

Fau, Amaano., D. (2022). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. CV. Mitra Cendekia Media.

Fitriani Duha. (2022). Analisis Hukum Tindak Pidana Penghinaan Secara Elektronik (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 2290 K/Pid.Sus/2015) Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Hamzah, Andi. 1983. Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia (Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Harefa, A., D. (2022). Kumpulan Startegi & Metode Penulisan Ilmiah Terbaik Dosen Ilmu Hukum Di Perguruan Tinggi.

Harefa, D, Dkk. (2023). Relationship Student Learning Interest To The Learning Outcomes Of Natural Sciences. International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC), 4(2), 240–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i2.614

Harefa, Darmawan., D. (2023c). Teori perencanaan pembelajaran. CV Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/teori-perencanaan-pembelajaran-GO5ZY.html

Hiarij, Eddy O.S. 2014. Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Huda, Chairul. 2011. Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Loi., S.,K.,R., (2024). Kekuatan Hukum Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Ringan Secara Hukum Adat (Studi Di Desa Bawoganowo). Jurnal Panah Hukum 3 (2), https://doi.org/10.57094/jph.v3i2.1474

Martiman Suaizisiwa Sarumaha, D. (2023). Pendidikan karakter di era digital. CV. Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/pendidikan-karakter-di-era-digital-X4HB2.html

Martiman Suaizisiwa Sarumaha, D. (2023). Pendidikan karakter di era digital. CV. Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/pendidikan-karakter-di-era-digital-X4HB2.html

Marzuki, Peter Mahmut. 2005. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. 1999. Mengenal Hukum, Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Mukti Fajar dan Yulianto Achmad. 2010. Dualisme penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Nehe.,M. (2024). Putusan Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Yang Mengakibatkan Luka Berat Dan Matinya Orang (Studi Putusan Nomor 451/Pid.B/2022/Pn.Jkt.Utr). Jurnal Panah Hukum 3 (2), https://doi.org/10.57094/jph.v3i2.1930

Okerius Sisokhi, (2022). Analisis Putusan Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Pada Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan (Studiputusannomor 1002/Pid.B/2008/Pn.Smg). Angelama Lase. (2022)Analisis Hukum Terhadap Penjatuhan Hukuman Kepada Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berat (Studi Putusan Nomor 44/Pid.B/2018/Pn.Gst. Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Poernomo, Bambang. 2001. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Prakoso,Djoko. 1998. Hukum penitensier di Indonesia cetakan I. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Prasetyo, Teguh. 2010. Hukum Pidana. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Putri Awin Susanti Zamili. (2022). Kewenangan Tni Angkatan Laut Dalam Melakukan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Illegal Fishing (Studi Di Pangkalan Tni Al Nias). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Rahman Syamsudin dan Ismail Aris. 2014. Merajut Hukum Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Mitra wacana Media.

Ridwan, H.R. 2006. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Saefudien. 2001. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Saleh, Roeslan. 2003. Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Jakarta: Aksara Baru.

Sarumaha, M. D. (2022). Catatan Berbagai Metode & Pengalaman Mengajar Dosen di Perguruan Tinggi. Lutfi Gilang. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=8WkwxCwAAAAJ&authuser=1&citation_for_view=8WkwxCwAAAAJ:-f6ydRqryjwC

Sarumaha, Martiman S., D. (2023). Model-model pembelajaran. CV Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/modelmodel-pembelajaran-0BM3W.html

Setiady, Tolip. 2010. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Penitensier Indonesia Cetakan I. bandung: Alfabeta.

Soekito, Sri Widoyanti Wiratmono. 1982. Anak dan Wanita Dalam Hukum. Jakarta: LP3E.

Soerjono Soekanto dan Srimamudji. 2015. Metode Penelitian Hukum, Catatan Ke-17. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Waruwu., Y. (2024). Penjatuhan Hukuman Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penyeludupan Manusia Di Bawah Ancaman Batas Minimum (Studi Putusan Nomor 483/Pid.Sus./2020/PN.Btm).Jurnal Panah Hukum 3 (2), https://doi.org/10.57094/jph.v3i2.1353

Yuniar Hati Laia (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Pemidanaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor. 104/Pid.B/2016/Pn.Gst). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Yuniar, Yanti. 2012. Kamus Lengkap Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit Agung Mulia.

Published
2025-07-31