PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENJATUHAN PUTUSAN LEPAS DARI SEGALA TUNTUTAN HUKUM KEPADA PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENGRUSAKAN SECARA BERSAMA-SAMA
(Studi Putusan Nomor 404/Pid.B/2018/PN Pbr)
Abstract
Criminal trespass is breaking the law and damaging someone else's property or property. A decision to find a defendant not guilty of all charges is a judicial decision that the defendant's actions did not constitute a crime. Resolution No. 404/Pid.B/2018/PN Pbr is one of the resolutions in which the accused was acquitted of all charges. Therefore, the aim of this study is to know and analyze the reasoning of the judges when deciding whether to drop all legal charges against the authors. This study collected secondary data including primary legal data, secondary legal data and third legal data and used the traditional legal research method which uses legal legal approach, case approach and analytical approach. Based on the observations and discussions, it can be concluded that the judges took into account the decision to jointly formulate all legal charges against the perpetrators of the crime (Decision No. 404/Pid.B /2018/PN Pbr). ) in relation to article 170.1. A witness Hendry Liberty. The couple claimed to own the land where the crime took place, and the accused and witnesses were able to prove this with land ownership certificates from both parties. The authors suggest that law enforcement officials, especially prosecutors, should pay more attention or investigate more deeply the cases they handle to avoid confusing the judge by dismissing all charges against the accused judge.
References
Ahmad Kamil dan M. Fauzan. 2008. Kaidah-Kaidah Hukum Yurisprudensi. Jakarta: Kencana.
Aji, Oemar Seno. 1984. Hukum Hakim Pidana. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Ali, Zainudin. 2014. Metode Penlitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Andi Sofyan dan Nur Azisa. 2016. Hukum Pidana. Makassar: Pustaka Pena Press.
Arifman Febriyanto Saputra Zamili. (2022). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Pemidanaan Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencabulan (Studi Putusan Nomor 6/Pid.Sus.Anak/2016/Pn.Mbn)Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Artis Duha , (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Hukuman Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana (Studi Putusan Nomor 175/Pid.B/2020/Pn Gst). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Arto, Mukti. 2004. Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama. Cet. V. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Atozanolo Baene. 2022. 1. Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Bisman Gaurifa. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Dalam Pembuatan Akta Jual Beli Tanah. Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Edisama Buulolo. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Penjatuhan Pidana Pada Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Dengan Kekerasan (Studi Putusan Nomor 680/Pid.B/2016/Pn. Mlg) . Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Fau, A. D. (2022). Kumpulan Berbagai Karya Ilmiah & Metode Penelitian Terbaik Dosen Di Perguruan Tinggi. CV. Mitra Cendekia Media.
Fau, Amaano., D. (2022). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. CV. Mitra Cendekia Media.
Fitriani Duha. (2022). Analisis Hukum Tindak Pidana Penghinaan Secara Elektronik (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 2290 K/Pid.Sus/2015) Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Hamzah, Andi. 1996. KUHP dan KUHAP. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Harahap, M. Yahya. 2001. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Penyidikan dan Penuntutan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Harefa, A., D. (2022). Kumpulan Startegi & Metode Penulisan Ilmiah Terbaik Dosen Ilmu Hukum Di Perguruan Tinggi.
Harefa, D, Dkk. (2023). Relationship Student Learning Interest To The Learning Outcomes Of Natural Sciences. International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC), 4(2), 240–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i2.614
Harefa, Darmawan., D. (2023c). Teori perencanaan pembelajaran. CV Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/teori-perencanaan-pembelajaran-GO5ZY.html
Loi., S.,K.,R., (2024). Kekuatan Hukum Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Ringan Secara Hukum Adat (Studi Di Desa Bawoganowo). Jurnal Panah Hukum 3 (2), https://doi.org/10.57094/jph.v3i2.1474
Martiman Suaizisiwa Sarumaha, D. (2023). Pendidikan karakter di era digital. CV. Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/pendidikan-karakter-di-era-digital-X4HB2.html
Martiman Suaizisiwa Sarumaha, D. (2023). Pendidikan karakter di era digital. CV. Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/pendidikan-karakter-di-era-digital-X4HB2.html
Nehe.,M. (2024). Putusan Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Yang Mengakibatkan Luka Berat Dan Matinya Orang (Studi Putusan Nomor 451/Pid.B/2022/Pn.Jkt.Utr). Jurnal Panah Hukum 3 (2), https://doi.org/10.57094/jph.v3i2.1930
Okerius Sisokhi, (2022). Analisis Putusan Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Pada Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan (Studiputusannomor 1002/Pid.B/2008/Pn.Smg). Angelama Lase. (2022)Analisis Hukum Terhadap Penjatuhan Hukuman Kepada Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berat (Studi Putusan Nomor 44/Pid.B/2018/Pn.Gst. Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Putri Awin Susanti Zamili. (2022). Kewenangan Tni Angkatan Laut Dalam Melakukan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Illegal Fishing (Studi Di Pangkalan Tni Al Nias). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Sarumaha, M. D. (2022). Catatan Berbagai Metode & Pengalaman Mengajar Dosen di Perguruan Tinggi. Lutfi Gilang. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=8WkwxCwAAAAJ&authuser=1&citation_for_view=8WkwxCwAAAAJ:-f6ydRqryjwC
Sarumaha, Martiman S., D. (2023). Model-model pembelajaran. CV Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/modelmodel-pembelajaran-0BM3W.html
Waruwu., Y. (2024). Penjatuhan Hukuman Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penyeludupan Manusia Di Bawah Ancaman Batas Minimum (Studi Putusan Nomor 483/Pid.Sus./2020/PN.Btm).Jurnal Panah Hukum 3 (2), https://doi.org/10.57094/jph.v3i2.1353
Yuniar Hati Laia (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Pemidanaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor. 104/Pid.B/2016/Pn.Gst). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Copyright (c) 2025 Kaima Giawa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
