PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP HAK-HAK TERSANGKA DALAM PROSES PENYIDIKAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENGEROYOKAN YANG DILAKUKAN SECARA BERSAMA-SAMA

  • Kristinus Laia Universitas Nias Raya
Keywords: Legal Protection; Suspects' Rights; Investigation; Crime of Assault;

Abstract

Legal protection is an effort to protect the government or authorities with a number of existing regulations. In this research, the problem formulation is how the law protects the rights of suspects in the process of investigating cases of criminal acts of assault which are carried out jointly (decision study 475 K/Pid/2018). Investigators violated the suspect's rights during the investigation into decision Number 475 K/Pid/2018. The type of research used is normative legal research using the statutory approach, case approach and analytical approach. Data collection was carried out using primary data, secondary data and tertiary data. The data analysis used is descriptive qualitative analysis and conclusions are drawn using a deductive method. Based on research findings and discussions, it can be concluded that legal protection for suspects' rights has been regulated in statutory regulations in accordance with those contained in the Criminal Procedure Code contained in Articles 50-68, Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights, Laws Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power and National Police Chief Regulation Number 14 of 2012 concerning Management of Criminal Investigations. In the event of a violation of a suspect's rights, especially a violation regarding not being given the right to be accompanied by a legal advisor, the investigation report report and the indictment from the public prosecutor cannot be accepted or are null and void by law. The author advises investigators in the process of investigating a case to respect and fulfill the suspect's rights in accordance with applicable regulations. Before an investigation is carried out, the investigator first informs the suspect about his rights as a suspect, so that the suspect's rights can be fulfilled legally. It is also hoped that investigators will be more professional and pay attention to article 56 of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding the obligation of a suspect to be accompanied by a legal advisor if the threat of punishment is more than five years.

References

Abdul Mun'im dan Agung Legowo Tjiptomartono. 1982. Penerapan Ilmu Kedokteran Kehakiman dalam Proses Penyidikan Perkara. Jakarta: Karya Unpra.

Ali, Zainuddin. 2009. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Arifman Febriyanto Saputra Zamili. (2022). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Pemidanaan Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencabulan (Studi Putusan Nomor 6/Pid.Sus.Anak/2016/Pn.Mbn)Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Aristo M.A Pangaribuan, dkk. 2020. Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia. Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Artis Duha , (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Hukuman Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana (Studi Putusan Nomor 175/Pid.B/2020/Pn Gst). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Atozanolo Baene. 2022. Penerapan Hukum Pidana Pada Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi Yang Dilakukan Dalam Jabatan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1/Pid.Sus.Tpk/2017/Pn.Mdn). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Bisman Gaurifa. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Dalam Pembuatan Akta Jual Beli Tanah. Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Chazawi, Adami. 2005. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana 1. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Edisama Buulolo. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Penjatuhan Pidana Pada Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Dengan Kekerasan (Studi Putusan Nomor 680/Pid.B/2016/Pn. Mlg) . Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Fau, A. D. (2022). Kumpulan Berbagai Karya Ilmiah & Metode Penelitian Terbaik Dosen Di Perguruan Tinggi. CV. Mitra Cendekia Media.

Fau, Amaano., D. (2022). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. CV. Mitra Cendekia Media.

Fitriani Duha. (2022). Analisis Hukum Tindak Pidana Penghinaan Secara Elektronik (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 2290 K/Pid.Sus/2015) Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Hamzah, Andi. 2017. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Harahap, M. Yahya. 2016. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Penyidikan dan Penuntutan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Harefa, A., D. (2022). Kumpulan Startegi & Metode Penulisan Ilmiah Terbaik Dosen Ilmu Hukum Di Perguruan Tinggi.

Harefa, D, Dkk. (2023). Relationship Student Learning Interest To The Learning Outcomes Of Natural Sciences. International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC), 4(2), 240–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i2.614

Harefa, Darmawan., D. (2023c). Teori perencanaan pembelajaran. CV Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/teori-perencanaan-pembelajaran-GO5ZY.html

Lamintang P.AF. 1997. Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Loi., S.,K.,R., (2024). Kekuatan Hukum Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Ringan Secara Hukum Adat (Studi Di Desa Bawoganowo). Jurnal Panah Hukum 3 (2), https://doi.org/10.57094/jph.v3i2.1474

Marpaung, Leden. 1992. Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Martiman Suaizisiwa Sarumaha, D. (2023). Pendidikan karakter di era digital. CV. Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/pendidikan-karakter-di-era-digital-X4HB2.html

Martiman Suaizisiwa Sarumaha, D. (2023). Pendidikan karakter di era digital. CV. Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/pendidikan-karakter-di-era-digital-X4HB2.html

Marzuki, Peter Mahmut. 2005. Penelitianm Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Moeljanto. 2002. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Nehe.,M. (2024). Putusan Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Yang Mengakibatkan Luka Berat Dan Matinya Orang (Studi Putusan Nomor 451/Pid.B/2022/Pn.Jkt.Utr). Jurnal Panah Hukum 3 (2), https://doi.org/10.57094/jph.v3i2.1930

Okerius Sisokhi, (2022). Analisis Putusan Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Pada Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan (Studiputusannomor 1002/Pid.B/2008/Pn.Smg). Angelama Lase. (2022)Analisis Hukum Terhadap Penjatuhan Hukuman Kepada Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berat (Studi Putusan Nomor 44/Pid.B/2018/Pn.Gst. Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Putri Awin Susanti Zamili. (2022). Kewenangan Tni Angkatan Laut Dalam Melakukan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Illegal Fishing (Studi Di Pangkalan Tni Al Nias). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Sarumaha, M. D. (2022). Catatan Berbagai Metode & Pengalaman Mengajar Dosen di Perguruan Tinggi. Lutfi Gilang. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=8WkwxCwAAAAJ&authuser=1&citation_for_view=8WkwxCwAAAAJ:-f6ydRqryjwC

Sarumaha, Martiman S., D. (2023). Model-model pembelajaran. CV Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/modelmodel-pembelajaran-0BM3W.html

Waruwu., Y. (2024). Penjatuhan Hukuman Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penyeludupan Manusia Di Bawah Ancaman Batas Minimum (Studi Putusan Nomor 483/Pid.Sus./2020/PN.Btm).Jurnal Panah Hukum 3 (2), https://doi.org/10.57094/jph.v3i2.1353

Yuniar Hati Laia (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Pemidanaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor. 104/Pid.B/2016/Pn.Gst). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Published
2025-07-31