PEMIDANAAN MELEBIHI ANCAMAN MAKSIMAL PADA TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN MATINYA ORANG
Abstract
The crime of abuse is a crime that can cause injuries and pain that can endanger or damage the health of the human body and limbs and even cause death. Meanwhile, abuse that results in the death of a person is an act of crime against a person's body or soul, where in formulating an act of abuse that results in death, it must be seen that the person's death was not intended, meaning that the perpetrator did not intend that the abuse he committed would result in death. To minimize these crimes from occurring, law enforcement is needed in accordance with the provisions of applicable laws and regulations with the aim of providing a deterrent effect to perpetrators of criminal acts. Based on this background, the author is interested in conducting research with the title punishment exceeding the maximum threat for criminal acts of abuse. resulting in the death of people. (study decision number 219/Pid.B/2018/PN Bgl). The type of research used is normative legal research using the statutory regulatory approach, case approach and analytical approach. Data collection was carried out using secondary data obtained through library materials consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The data analysis used is descriptive qualitative analysis and conclusions are drawn using a deductive method. Based on the research findings and discussion, it can be concluded that punishment exceeding the maximum threat for criminal acts of abuse which result in the death of a person (decision number 219/Pid.B/2018/PN Bgl) is based on the facts revealed at trial taking into account the juridical basis, and non-juridical, and must consider philosophical foundations. Meanwhile, in imposing a crime that exceeds the maximum threat to the perpetrator, the judge pronounces a decision that is not in accordance with the provisions of the applicable laws and regulations, where in Article 351 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code, the maximum criminal threat limit has been determined for violations of criminal acts of abuse that result in the death of a person. The author suggests that judges in handing down decisions to perpetrators of criminal acts of abuse which result in the death of people should be based on the provisions on threats in the article which are proven at trial so as to provide a sense of justice for both the victim and the perpetrator.
References
Ali, Zainuddin. 2009. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Arifman Febriyanto Saputra Zamili. (2022). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Pemidanaan Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencabulan (Studi Putusan Nomor 6/Pid.Sus.Anak/2016/Pn.Mbn)Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Artis Duha , (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Hukuman Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana (Studi Putusan Nomor 175/Pid.B/2020/Pn Gst). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2006. Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI
Atozanolo Baene. 2022. Penerapan Hukum Pidana Pada Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi Yang Dilakukan Dalam Jabatan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1/Pid.Sus.Tpk/2017/Pn.Mdn). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Bisman Gaurifa. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Dalam Pembuatan Akta Jual Beli Tanah. Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Chazawi, Adami. 2008. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian 1 Stelsel Pidana, Tindak Pidana, Teori-Teori Pemidanaan & Batas Berlakunya Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo.
Edisama Buulolo. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Penjatuhan Pidana Pada Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Dengan Kekerasan (Studi Putusan Nomor 680/Pid.B/2016/Pn. Mlg) . Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Efendi,Tholib. 2016. Praktik Peradilan Pidana. Malang: Setara Press.
Fau, A. D. (2022). Kumpulan Berbagai Karya Ilmiah & Metode Penelitian Terbaik Dosen Di Perguruan Tinggi. CV. Mitra Cendekia Media.
Fau, Amaano., D. (2022). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. CV. Mitra Cendekia Media.
Fitriani Duha. (2022). Analisis Hukum Tindak Pidana Penghinaan Secara Elektronik (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 2290 K/Pid.Sus/2015) Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Hakim, Lukman. 2020. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. Yokyakarta: CV Budi Utama.
Harefa, A., D. (2022). Kumpulan Startegi & Metode Penulisan Ilmiah Terbaik Dosen Ilmu Hukum Di Perguruan Tinggi.
Harefa, D, Dkk. (2023). Relationship Student Learning Interest To The Learning Outcomes Of Natural Sciences. International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC), 4(2), 240–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i2.614
Harefa, Darmawan., D. (2023c). Teori perencanaan pembelajaran. CV Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/teori-perencanaan-pembelajaran-GO5ZY.html
Ismi Gunadi & Jonaedi Efendi. 2014. Cepat & Mudah Memahami Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Group.
Lamintang Dan The Lamintang. 2013. Pembahasan KUHAP Menurut Ilmu Pengetahuan Hukum Pidana Dan Yurisprudensi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Loi., S.,K.,R., (2024). Kekuatan Hukum Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Ringan Secara Hukum Adat (Studi Di Desa Bawoganowo). Jurnal Panah Hukum 3 (2), https://doi.org/10.57094/jph.v3i2.1474
Mappiasse, Syarif Mappiasse. 2015. Logika Hukum Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Marpaung, Leden. 2005. Tindak Pidana Terhadap Nyawa dan Tubuh. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Martiman Suaizisiwa Sarumaha, D. (2023). Pendidikan karakter di era digital. CV. Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/pendidikan-karakter-di-era-digital-X4HB2.html
Martiman Suaizisiwa Sarumaha, D. (2023). Pendidikan karakter di era digital. CV. Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/pendidikan-karakter-di-era-digital-X4HB2.html
Mukti Fajar dan Yulianto Achmad. 2010. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Nehe.,M. (2024). Putusan Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Yang Mengakibatkan Luka Berat Dan Matinya Orang (Studi Putusan Nomor 451/Pid.B/2022/Pn.Jkt.Utr). Jurnal Panah Hukum 3 (2), https://doi.org/10.57094/jph.v3i2.1930
Notohamidjojo. 1970. Makna Negara Hukum. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Kristen.
Okerius Sisokhi, (2022). Analisis Putusan Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Pada Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan (Studiputusannomor 1002/Pid.B/2008/Pn.Smg). Angelama Lase. (2022)Analisis Hukum Terhadap Penjatuhan Hukuman Kepada Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berat (Studi Putusan Nomor 44/Pid.B/2018/Pn.Gst. Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Putri Awin Susanti Zamili. (2022). Kewenangan Tni Angkatan Laut Dalam Melakukan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Illegal Fishing (Studi Di Pangkalan Tni Al Nias). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Sarumaha, M. D. (2022). Catatan Berbagai Metode & Pengalaman Mengajar Dosen di Perguruan Tinggi. Lutfi Gilang. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=8WkwxCwAAAAJ&authuser=1&citation_for_view=8WkwxCwAAAAJ:-f6ydRqryjwC
Sarumaha, Martiman S., D. (2023). Model-model pembelajaran. CV Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/modelmodel-pembelajaran-0BM3W.html
Soesilo, R. 2005. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Serta Komentar Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal. Bogor: PT. Politea.
Sudarto. 1986. Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Waruwu., Y. (2024). Penjatuhan Hukuman Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penyeludupan Manusia Di Bawah Ancaman Batas Minimum (Studi Putusan Nomor 483/Pid.Sus./2020/PN.Btm).Jurnal Panah Hukum 3 (2), https://doi.org/10.57094/jph.v3i2.1353
Yuniar Hati Laia (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Pemidanaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor. 104/Pid.B/2016/Pn.Gst). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Copyright (c) 2025 Yufran Dakhi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.