PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PEMIDANAAN PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA BIDANG PANGAN
(Studi Putusan Nomor 1130/Pid.B/2016/PN.Bdg)
Abstract
Nowadays, there are more and more cases of food crimes and there are also many punishments for food criminals that are decided by the courts and have legal force that is not in accordance with laws and regulations. One of the said judgments is judgment number 1130/Pid.B/2016/PN.Bdg. In the said judgment, the offender was convicted under Article 135 jo. Article 71 paragraph (2) letter a of the Food Act carries the threat of imprisonment or fines, but the judge imposes imprisonment along with the fine. Therefore, this study aims to find out and analyze the judge's considerations in the punishment of perpetrators of food crimes (study of verdict number 1130/Pid.B/2016/PN.Bdg). This research uses a type of normative legal research, using secondary data and methods of approaching laws and regulations, case approaches, and analytical approaches, as well as using qualitative data analysis. Based on the findings of research and discussion, it can be concluded that the judge's consideration in sentencing perpetrators of food crimes (study decision number 1130/Pid.B/2016/PN.Bdg) consists of juridical and non-juridical considerations. Juridically, the perpetrator has been proven to have committed a criminal act as referred to in Article 135 jo. Article 71 paragraph (2) letter a of the Food Act. Non-juridically, there is a burdensome reason for the punishment for the perpetrator, namely that the perpetrator has been convicted. Therefore, the imposition of imprisonment along with the fine in the judgment is a punishment for the perpetrator. However, in this article, there is a threat of a fairly high penalty, namely a maximum of 2 (two) years in prison or a maximum fine of Rp 4,000,000,000 (four billion rupiah). In order to impose a sentence on the perpetrator, the judge can impose a maximum prison sentence or a maximum fine, so that the judge's decision does not seem to deviate from the Food Law. The researcher suggested that the judge in passing each conviction in accordance with the criminal threat in the Food Act.
References
Arifman Febriyanto Saputra Zamili. (2022). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Pemidanaan Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencabulan (Studi Putusan Nomor 6/Pid.Sus.Anak/2016/Pn.Mbn)Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Artis Duha , (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Hukuman Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana (Studi Putusan Nomor 175/Pid.B/2020/Pn Gst). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Atozanolo Baene. 2022. Penerapan Hukum Pidana Pada Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi Yang Dilakukan Dalam Jabatan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1/Pid.Sus.Tpk/2017/Pn.Mdn). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Bisman Gaurifa. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Dalam Pembuatan Akta Jual Beli Tanah. Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Chazawi, Adami. 2002. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian 1 (Stelse Pidana, Tindak Pidana Teori-teori pemidanaan dan Batas berlakunya). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Edisama Buulolo. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Penjatuhan Pidana Pada Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Dengan Kekerasan (Studi Putusan Nomor 680/Pid.B/2016/Pn. Mlg) . Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Fau, A. D. (2022). Kumpulan Berbagai Karya Ilmiah & Metode Penelitian Terbaik Dosen Di Perguruan Tinggi. CV. Mitra Cendekia Media.
Fau, Amaano., D. (2022). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. CV. Mitra Cendekia Media.
Fitriani Duha. (2022). Analisis Hukum Tindak Pidana Penghinaan Secara Elektronik (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 2290 K/Pid.Sus/2015) Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Harahap, M. Yahya. 2005. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali, Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Harefa, A., D. (2022). Kumpulan Startegi & Metode Penulisan Ilmiah Terbaik Dosen Ilmu Hukum Di Perguruan Tinggi.
Harefa, Arianus. 2023. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Pasca Berlakunya KUHP Nasional. Jawa Barat: CV. Jejak.
Harefa, D, Dkk. (2023). Relationship Student Learning Interest To The Learning Outcomes Of Natural Sciences. International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC), 4(2), 240–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i2.614
Harefa, Darmawan., D. (2023c). Teori perencanaan pembelajaran. CV Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/teori-perencanaan-pembelajaran-GO5ZY.html
Hari Sasangka dan Lily Rosita. 2003. Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Pidana. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
http://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/869.
https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/sistem.
https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id.
https://slideplayer.info/slide/3359258/.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Kristiyanti, Celina Tri Siwi. 2011. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Loi., S.,K.,R., (2024). Kekuatan Hukum Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Ringan Secara Hukum Adat (Studi Di Desa Bawoganowo). Jurnal Panah Hukum 3 (2), https://doi.org/10.57094/jph.v3i2.1474
Martiman Suaizisiwa Sarumaha, D. (2023). Pendidikan karakter di era digital. CV. Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/pendidikan-karakter-di-era-digital-X4HB2.html
Martiman Suaizisiwa Sarumaha, D. (2023). Pendidikan karakter di era digital. CV. Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/pendidikan-karakter-di-era-digital-X4HB2.html
Muhaimin. 2020. Metode Penelitian Hukum, Cetakan Pertama. Mataram: Mataram University Press.
Muladi. 2008. Lembaga Pidana Bersyarat. Bandung: Alumni.
Nehe.,M. (2024). Putusan Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Yang Mengakibatkan Luka Berat Dan Matinya Orang (Studi Putusan Nomor 451/Pid.B/2022/Pn.Jkt.Utr). Jurnal Panah Hukum 3 (2), https://doi.org/10.57094/jph.v3i2.1930
Okerius Sisokhi, (2022). Analisis Putusan Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Pada Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan (Studiputusannomor 1002/Pid.B/2008/Pn.Smg). Angelama Lase. (2022)Analisis Hukum Terhadap Penjatuhan Hukuman Kepada Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berat (Studi Putusan Nomor 44/Pid.B/2018/Pn.Gst. Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Putri Awin Susanti Zamili. (2022). Kewenangan Tni Angkatan Laut Dalam Melakukan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Illegal Fishing (Studi Di Pangkalan Tni Al Nias). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Rahmad, Riadi Asra. 2019. Hukum Acara Pidana. Depok: Rajawali Pres.
Sarumaha, M. D. (2022). Catatan Berbagai Metode & Pengalaman Mengajar Dosen di Perguruan Tinggi. Lutfi Gilang. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=8WkwxCwAAAAJ&authuser=1&citation_for_view=8WkwxCwAAAAJ:-f6ydRqryjwC
Sarumaha, Martiman S., D. (2023). Model-model pembelajaran. CV Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/modelmodel-pembelajaran-0BM3W.html
Sinlaeloe, Paul. 2015. Memahami Surat Dakwaan. Kupang: Piar NTT.
Surat Edaran Jaksa Agung Nomor SE-004/J.A/11/1993 tentang Pembuatan Surat Dakwaan.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2012 tentang Pangan.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Waruwu., Y. (2024). Penjatuhan Hukuman Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penyeludupan Manusia Di Bawah Ancaman Batas Minimum (Studi Putusan Nomor 483/Pid.Sus./2020/PN.Btm).Jurnal Panah Hukum 3 (2), https://doi.org/10.57094/jph.v3i2.1353
Widiarty, Wiwik Sri. 2016. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Produk Pangan Kadaluwarsa. Depok: PT. Komodo Books.
Yuniar Hati Laia (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Pemidanaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor. 104/Pid.B/2016/Pn.Gst). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Copyright (c) 2025 Sudirman Laia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
