PENJATUHAN PUTUSAN PEMIDANAAN DIBAWAH ANCAMAN MINIMUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENCABULAN KEPADA ANAK DI BAWAH UMUR

Studi Putusan Nomor 354/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.Lht

  • Diswanto Haria Universitas Nias Raya
Keywords: Sentencing Decision; Minimum Threat; Crime of Obscenity

Abstract

Obscenity is a crime and immoral offense that can be committed by anyone, regardless of the perpetrator's social status, age, educational background, gender and other things that cause unrest among local residents. One of the criminal acts of obscenity that has been examined and tried by the Lahat District Court is decision number 354/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.Lht. In this decision, the perpetrator was sentenced to prison for 1 (one) year and 6 (six) months for allegedly violating Article 82 of Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection. The type of research used is normative legal research using the statutory approach, case approach, comparative approach and analytical approach. Data collection was carried out using secondary data obtained through library materials consisting of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The data analysis used is descriptive qualitative analysis and conclusions are drawn using the inductive method. Based on the research findings and discussion, it can be concluded that the imposition of criminal decisions on perpetrators of criminal acts of sexual immorality (study decision number 354/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.Lht) is not in accordance with the applicable law and is contrary to human rights. In Article 82 of Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection, it is stipulated that the threat of imprisonment is a minimum of 3 years and a maximum of 15 years and a fine of at least Rp. 60,000,000 and a maximum of Rp. 300,000,000. The panel of judges sentenced the perpetrator to prison under a minimum threat of 1 year and 6 months with a fine adjusted to the applicable article. The sentence given to the defendant should be a minimum of 3 years and a maximum of 15 years. The author suggests that the Panel of Judges who examine and decide on a criminal case should be more careful in determining the actions carried out in accordance with the elements of the articles of the statutory regulations.

References

Ali, Mahrus. 2011.Dasar-dasar Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Ali, Zaimudin. 2014.Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Arifman Febriyanto Saputra Zamili. (2022). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Pemidanaan Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencabulan (Studi Putusan Nomor 6/Pid.Sus.Anak/2016/Pn.Mbn)Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Artis Duha , (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Hukuman Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana (Studi Putusan Nomor 175/Pid.B/2020/Pn Gst). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Atozanolo Baene. 2022. Penerapan Hukum Pidana Pada Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi Yang Dilakukan Dalam Jabatan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1/Pid.Sus.Tpk/2017/Pn.Mdn). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Bisman Gaurifa. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Dalam Pembuatan Akta Jual Beli Tanah. Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Chazawi, Adami. 2007.Pelajaran Hukum Pidana1. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo.

Darmawan Harefa, Murnihati Sarumaha, Kaminudin Telaumbanua, Tatema Telaumbanua, Baziduhu Laia, F. H. (2023). Relationship Student Learning Interest To The Learning Outcomes Of Natural Sciences. International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC), 4(2), 240–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i2.614

Edisama Buulolo. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Penjatuhan Pidana Pada Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Dengan Kekerasan (Studi Putusan Nomor 680/Pid.B/2016/Pn. Mlg) . Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Fau, A. D. (2022b). Kumpulan Berbagai Karya Ilmiah & Metode Penelitian Terbaik Dosen Di Perguruan Tinggi. CV. Mitra Cendekia Media.

Fau, Amaano., D. (2022). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. CV. Mitra Cendekia Media.

Fitriani Duha. (2022). Analisis Hukum Tindak Pidana Penghinaan Secara Elektronik (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 2290 K/Pid.Sus/2015) Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Harefa, A., D. (2022). Kumpulan Startegi & Metode Penulisan Ilmiah Terbaik Dosen Ilmu Hukum Di Perguruan Tinggi.

Harefa, Arianus. 2023. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Telukdalam: Universitas Nias Raya.

Harefa, Darmawan., D. (2023c). Teori perencanaan pembelajaran. CV Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/teori-perencanaan-pembelajaran-GO5ZY.html

Ilyas, Amir. 2012.Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Rengkang Education.

Jakarta: Sinargrafika.

Koesnan.R.A.2010.Susunan Pidanadalam Negara Sosialis Indonesia.Bandung: Sumur

Laden, Marpaung.2004.Kejahatan Terhadap Kesusilaan dan Masalah Provensinya.

Lamintang, P.A.F. 1997.Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia.Bandung: PT. Citra AdityaBaksti.

Marsaid.2015. Perlindungan Hukum Anak Pidana Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam (MaqasidAsy-Syari’ah). Palembang: NoerFikri.

Martiman Suaizisiwa Sarumaha, D. (2023). Pendidikan karakter di era digital. CV. Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/pendidikan-karakter-di-era-digital-X4HB2.html

Martiman Suaizisiwa Sarumaha, D. (2023). Pendidikan karakter di era digital. CV. Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/pendidikan-karakter-di-era-digital-X4HB2.html

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. 2010.MengenalHukum.EdisiRevisi. Yogyakarta: MahakaryaPustaka.

Muliadi dan Barda Nawawi Arief. 2010.Teori-Teori Dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Grafindo.

Okerius Sisokhi, (2022). Analisis Putusan Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Pada Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan (Studiputusannomor 1002/Pid.B/2008/Pn.Smg). Angelama Lase. (2022)Analisis Hukum Terhadap Penjatuhan Hukuman Kepada Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berat (Studi Putusan Nomor 44/Pid.B/2018/Pn.Gst. Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Poernomo, Bambang. 1982.Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Prastyo. Teguh. 2014.Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. 2003. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Bandung: RefikaAditama.

Putri Awin Susanti Zamili. (2022). Kewenangan Tni Angkatan Laut Dalam Melakukan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Illegal Fishing (Studi Di Pangkalan Tni Al Nias). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Sarumaha, M. D. (2022). Catatan Berbagai Metode & Pengalaman Mengajar Dosen di Perguruan Tinggi. Lutfi Gilang. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=8WkwxCwAAAAJ&authuser=1&citation_for_view=8WkwxCwAAAAJ:-f6ydRqryjwC

Sarumaha, Martiman S., D. (2023). Model-model pembelajaran. CV Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/modelmodel-pembelajaran-0BM3W.html

Soedarso.1992.Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: Rineka.

Soerjono Soekanto dan Srimamudji.2015.Metode Penelitian Hukum.Catatan Ke-17. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Soesilo, R.1981, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Bogor: Politea.

Witanto, D.Y. 2012.Hakdan Kehidupan Anak Luar Kawin. Jakarta: Kencana.

Yuniar Hati Laia (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Pemidanaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor. 104/Pid.B/2016/Pn.Gst). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1

Published
2024-07-31