PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM PADA PENJATUHAN HUKUMAN KEPADA PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN KEPADA ANAK YANG MENGAKIBATKAN MATI
(Studi Putusan Nomor 29/Pid.Sus/2017/PN.Kpg)
Abstract
An act that violates the law, has an element of error, and is punishable by a crime is called a criminal act. The aim of criminal punishment against the perpetrator is to guarantee public interests and maintain legal justice. Decision number 29/Pid.Sus/2017/PN.Kpg is one of the criminal acts of obscenity that has been sent and tried by the Kupang District Court. For alleged violations of Article 80 paragraphs (3) and (4) of Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection, the perpetrator was sentenced to 4 (four) years in prison. Normative legal research using a statutory regulation approach, case approach, comparative approach and analytical approach is the type of research carried out. Secondary data obtained from library sources, including primary and secondary law books, was used to collect data. An inductive approach was used to obtain conclusions from qualitative descriptive data analysis. From the results of the research and discussion, it can be determined that anyone who commits a criminal act against Decision Number 29/Pid.Sus/2017/PN.Kpg) will be punished in accordance with the applicable provisions. The provisions in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) are added if necessary, and if it results in death, imprisonment is based on Article 80 paragraphs (3) and (4) of Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection up to 15 year. It was his parents that he felt for. The perpetrator was sentenced to four years in prison by the panel of judges. Based on the applicable provisions, the judge imposed sanctions. The author suggests that judges in the panel that examines and decides on a criminal case should be more careful in deciding whether the actions carried out are in accordance with the provisions of the relevant laws and regulations.
References
Ali, Mahrus. 2011. Dasar-Dasar Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Ali, Zaimudin. 2014. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. 2010. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Arifman Febriyanto Saputra Zamili. (2022). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Pemidanaan Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencabulan (Studi Putusan Nomor 6/Pid.Sus.Anak/2016/Pn.Mbn)Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Artis Duha , (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Hukuman Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana (Studi Putusan Nomor 175/Pid.B/2020/Pn Gst). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Atozanolo Baene. 2022. Penerapan Hukum Pidana Pada Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi Yang Dilakukan Dalam Jabatan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1/Pid.Sus.Tpk/2017/Pn.Mdn). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Bisman Gaurifa. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Dalam Pembuatan Akta Jual Beli Tanah. Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Chazawi, Adami. 2007. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana 1. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo.
Darmawan Harefa, Murnihati Sarumaha, Kaminudin Telaumbanua, Tatema Telaumbanua, Baziduhu Laia, F. H. (2023). Relationship Student Learning Interest To The Learning Outcomes Of Natural Sciences. International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC), 4(2), 240–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i2.614
Edisama Buulolo. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Penjatuhan Pidana Pada Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Dengan Kekerasan (Studi Putusan Nomor 680/Pid.B/2016/Pn. Mlg) . Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Farid, Andi Zainal Abidin dan A.Hamzah. 2010. Bentuk-Bentuk Khusus Perwujudan Delik (Percobaan, Penyertaan dan Gabungan Delik) dan Hukum Penitensier. Jakarta: PT. Rajagrapindo Persada.
Fau, A. D. (2022b). Kumpulan Berbagai Karya Ilmiah & Metode Penelitian Terbaik Dosen Di Perguruan Tinggi. CV. Mitra Cendekia Media.
Fau, Amaano., D. (2022). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. CV. Mitra Cendekia Media.
Fitriani Duha. (2022). Analisis Hukum Tindak Pidana Penghinaan Secara Elektronik (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 2290 K/Pid.Sus/2015) Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Harahap, M. Yahya. 2003. Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian, (Bandung: Grafindo.)
Harefa, A., D. (2022). Kumpulan Startegi & Metode Penulisan Ilmiah Terbaik Dosen Ilmu Hukum Di Perguruan Tinggi.
Harefa, Arianus. 2023. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Telukdalam: Universitas Nias Raya.
Harefa, Darmawan., D. (2023c). Teori perencanaan pembelajaran. CV Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/teori-perencanaan-pembelajaran-GO5ZY.html
Hiariej, Eddy. 2012. Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Lamintang , P.A.F. 1997. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Baksti.
Marlina. 2009. Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Marsaid, 2015. Perlindungan Hukum Anak Pidana Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam (Maqasid Asy-Syari’ah). Palembang: NoerFikri.
Martiman Suaizisiwa Sarumaha, D. (2023). Pendidikan karakter di era digital. CV. Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/pendidikan-karakter-di-era-digital-X4HB2.html
Martiman Suaizisiwa Sarumaha, D. (2023). Pendidikan karakter di era digital. CV. Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/pendidikan-karakter-di-era-digital-X4HB2.html
Mulyadi, Lilik. 2005. Pengadilan Anak di Indonesia Teori, Praktek Permasalahannya. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Nawawi Arif, Barda. 1984. Sari Kuliah Hukum Pidana II. Bandung: Fakultas Hukum Undip.
Okerius Sisokhi, (2022). Analisis Putusan Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Pada Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan (Studiputusannomor 1002/Pid.B/2008/Pn.Smg). Angelama Lase. (2022)Analisis Hukum Terhadap Penjatuhan Hukuman Kepada Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berat (Studi Putusan Nomor 44/Pid.B/2018/Pn.Gst. Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. 2003. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Putri Awin Susanti Zamili. (2022). Kewenangan Tni Angkatan Laut Dalam Melakukan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Illegal Fishing (Studi Di Pangkalan Tni Al Nias). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Sarumaha, M. D. (2022). Catatan Berbagai Metode & Pengalaman Mengajar Dosen di Perguruan Tinggi. Lutfi Gilang. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=8WkwxCwAAAAJ&authuser=1&citation_for_view=8WkwxCwAAAAJ:-f6ydRqryjwC
Sarumaha, Martiman S., D. (2023). Model-model pembelajaran. CV Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/modelmodel-pembelajaran-0BM3W.html
Sasangka, Hari Lily Rosita. 2003. Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Pidana. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2003.
Soekanto, Soerjono dan Srimamudji. 2015. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Yuniar Hati Laia (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Pemidanaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor. 104/Pid.B/2016/Pn.Gst). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Copyright (c) 2024 Novari Ndruru

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.