MEKANISME PENYELESAIAN TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA SECARA HUKUM ADAT DI DESA BONIA HILISIMAETANO KECAMATAN MANIAMOLO KABUPATEN NIAS SELATAN
Abstract
The mechanism of domestic violence is the process of resolving any act against someone, especially women, which results in physical, sexual, psychological misery or suffering, and/or domestic neglect including threats to commit acts, coercion, or unlawful deprivation of liberty within the scope of household. The aim of this research is to find out the mechanism for resolving criminal acts of domestic violence according to customary law in Bonia Hilisimaetano Village, Maniamolo District, South Nias Regency. The type of research used is sociological or empirical legal research, namely examining applicable legal provisions based on existing facts in a society. Data collection was carried out using primary data, secondary data and tertiary data. obtained from secondary legal materials. The data analysis used is qualitative data analysis. Analyzing qualitative data is done concurrently with the process of gathering data. The research findings and discussion lead to the conclusion that Bonia Hilisimaetano Village, Maniamolo District, South Nias Regency, has a customary law-based mechanism for resolving criminal acts of domestic violence. This mechanism involves deliberation in the village, known locally as Orahu in Nias, with the village government inviting various parties, including the BPD, LAD (Fa'asiulu/Fa'asiila), the Head of the Hamlet, and other witnesses. The Village government then instructed the Village Office (customary authorities) to summon both parties (the offenders and the victim) to attend discussions to settle the crime of domestic abuse after verifying that the complaint had correct evidence. 2020 saw the perpetrator punished in line with the village of Bonia Hilisimaetano's customary law, which called for giving three pigs and Rp 3,000,000 (three million rupiah) to the victim's family as well as the village government. The victim was not hospitalized. This punishment, however, differs from that meted down to the offenders of the same offense in 2012 in that the victim was admitted to the hospital in addition to receiving Rp 3,000,000 and 1 (one) pig 4 alisi. It is intended that the penalties would serve as a deterrence to the offender and provide justice to the victim.
References
Abdul Wahid dan Muhammad Irfan. 2001. Perlindungan Terhadap Perempuan Korban Kekerasan Seksual: Advokasi Atas Hak Asasi Perempuan. Bandung: PT. Rafika Aditama.
Abdulrahman. 1984. Hukum Adat Menurut Perundang-undangan Republik Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Cendana Press.
Andrisman, Tri. 2009. Hukum Pidana Asas-Asas Dan Aturan Umum Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandar Lampung: Pustaka Pena Pers.
Anggraini, Nini, dkk. 2019. Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (KDRT) dan Perceraian Dalam Keluarga. Padang: Erka.
Aprilianti, Kasmawati. 2022. Hukum Adat di Indonesia. Bandar Lampung: Pusaka Media.
Arifman Febriyanto Saputra Zamili. (2022). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Pemidanaan Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencabulan (Studi Putusan Nomor 6/Pid.Sus.Anak/2016/Pn.Mbn)Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Artis Duha , (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Hukuman Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana (Studi Putusan Nomor 175/Pid.B/2020/Pn Gst). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Atozanolo Baene. 2022. 1. Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Bisman Gaurifa. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Dalam Pembuatan Akta Jual Beli Tanah. Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Chazawi, Adami. 2002. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana II. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Darmawan Harefa, Murnihati Sarumaha, Kaminudin Telaumbanua, Tatema Telaumbanua, Baziduhu Laia, F. H. (2023). Relationship Student Learning Interest To The Learning Outcomes Of Natural Sciences. International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC), 4(2), 240–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i2.614
E.Y. Kanter dan SR. Sianturi. 1992. Azas-azas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya. Jakarta: Alumni AHMPTHM.
Edisama Buulolo. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Penjatuhan Pidana Pada Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Dengan Kekerasan (Studi Putusan Nomor 680/Pid.B/2016/Pn. Mlg) . Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Fau, A. D. (2022b). Kumpulan Berbagai Karya Ilmiah & Metode Penelitian Terbaik Dosen Di Perguruan Tinggi. CV. Mitra Cendekia Media.
Fau, Amaano., D. (2022). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. CV. Mitra Cendekia Media.
Fitriani Duha. (2022). Analisis Hukum Tindak Pidana Penghinaan Secara Elektronik (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 2290 K/Pid.Sus/2015) Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Harefa, A., D. (2022). Kumpulan Startegi & Metode Penulisan Ilmiah Terbaik Dosen Ilmu Hukum Di Perguruan Tinggi.
Harefa, Darmawan., D. (2023c). Teori perencanaan pembelajaran. CV Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/teori-perencanaan-pembelajaran-GO5ZY.html
Herkutanto. 2000. Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan dan Sistem Hukum Pidana. Pendekatan dari sudut Pandang Kedokteran, dalam buku Penghapusan Diskriminasi Terhadap Wanita. Bandung: Alumni.
Johan Nasution, Bahder. 2013. Negara Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Lamintang, P. A. F. 1997. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Made Widnyana, I. 2010. Asas- Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Fikahati Aneska.
Marpaung, Ledeng. 2006. Asas- Teori- Praktik Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Martiman Suaizisiwa Sarumaha, D. (2023). Pendidikan karakter di era digital. CV. Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/pendidikan-karakter-di-era-digital-X4HB2.html
Martiman Suaizisiwa Sarumaha, D. (2023). Pendidikan karakter di era digital. CV. Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/pendidikan-karakter-di-era-digital-X4HB2.html
Mustafa Abdullah dan Ruben Achmad. 1983. Intisari Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Nawawi Arief, Barda. 1984. Sari Kuliah Hukum Pidana II. Bandung: Fakultas Hukum Undip.
Okerius Sisokhi, (2022). Analisis Putusan Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Pada Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan (Studiputusannomor 1002/Pid.B/2008/Pn.Smg). Angelama Lase. (2022)Analisis Hukum Terhadap Penjatuhan Hukuman Kepada Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berat (Studi Putusan Nomor 44/Pid.B/2018/Pn.Gst. Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Poernomo, Bambang. 1997. Pertumbuhan Hukum Penyimpangan di luar Kodifikas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
Poerwandari, Kristi. 2000. Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan Tinjauan Psikologis dalam buku Penghapusan Diskriminasi Terhadap Wanita. Bandung: Alumni.
Projodikoro, Wiryono. 1986. Azas- azas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Eresco.
Putri Awin Susanti Zamili. (2022). Kewenangan Tni Angkatan Laut Dalam Melakukan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Illegal Fishing (Studi Di Pangkalan Tni Al Nias). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Rasyid Ariman dan Fahmi Raghib. 2016. Hukum Pidana. Malang: Setara Press.
Sarumaha, M. D. (2022). Catatan Berbagai Metode & Pengalaman Mengajar Dosen di Perguruan Tinggi. Lutfi Gilang. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=8WkwxCwAAAAJ&authuser=1&citation_for_view=8WkwxCwAAAAJ:-f6ydRqryjwC
Sarumaha, Martiman S., D. (2023). Model-model pembelajaran. CV Jejak. https://tokobukujejak.com/detail/modelmodel-pembelajaran-0BM3W.html
Soepomo. 1993. Hukum Adat. Jakarta: PT Pradnya Paramita.
Sudiyat, Iman. 2010. Asas-Asas Hukum Adat Bekal Pengantar. Yogyakarta, Liberty.
Syamsuddin, Aziz. 2011. Tindak Pidana Khusus. Jakarta: Sinar Grafik.
Vallenhoven, Van. 1983. Orientasi Dalam Hukum Adat Indonesia. Jakarta: Jambat
Yuniar Hati Laia (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Pemidanaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor. 104/Pid.B/2016/Pn.Gst). Jurnal Panah Hukum, Vol 1 No 1
Copyright (c) 2024 Mersy Christine Gowasa Mersy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







